Most UK right to be forgotten applications to Google are likely to be refused
Google’s latest right to be forgotten statistics reveal that 3 out of 5 requests to delist web content from its search results are being refused. This is nearly 61% refusal rate.
When a right to be forgotten application is refused by Google, the alternatives could be much more expensive. It is therefore worth reading this article
How to make a successful right to be forgotten application before you submit your right to be forgotten applications to Google.
After we examined dozens of right to be forgotten applications we have concluded that there are only 3 main reasons for Google’s refusal to allow them: Read the full article 3 most common reasons for Google rejecting right to be forgotten applications here.
A Federal Court Judge in Germany ordered Google to adhere to requests to remove autocomplete entries from its Google search bar in Germany if they are defamatory.
The complainant, a corporate, whose name remains confidential, claimed that whenever someone carries out a Google search for its name, Google automatically prompts other searches that involves suggesting that the company was involved, among other things, in fraud.
Google replied by claiming that the autosuggestion functionality merely brings to attention the most popular searches its users carry out.
12 July 2013
Twitter has been ordered to reveal, to French Police, the identity of bigots who posted anti-Semitic and racist abuse.
Twitter argued that it should only be subject to US and was intending to defend the anonymity of users.
Prosecutors in Paris argue that the Twitter had a duty to expose those who post abuse and that this duty prevailed over a right to anonymity.
In April 2013 a mother in Brazil won a battle to have her deceased daughter’s Facebook page removed. The continuing messages and memories posted by her daughter’s friends had caused her huge distress so she pleaded Facebook to terminate the account.
On The Judge at Mato Grosso do Sul state court ordered Facebook to close down the account or face imprisonment.
Is Facebook as customer friendly as it makes out? (internetlawexpert.co.uk)
In April 2013 Google was ordered by a Japanese Court to change its autocomplete feature and ordered to pay 30,000 yen in damages to a Japanese man. Google’s autocomplete feature was linking the man to a series of crimes he did not commit when his name was typed in on the search engine.
Last year Tokyo District Court issued an injunction backing the Claimant which Google failed to honour.
The Claimant said that he had lost his job because of Google displaying search results that suggested that he was a notorious criminal.
This is the first reported case where Google is ordered by a Japanese court to change its search terms. To read the full article go to http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57579765-93/google-loses-autocomplete-defamation-suit-in-japan/.
A French tribunal ordered Twitter, in January 2013, to reveal the identities of the anonymous tweeters who were tweeting their anti-Semitic views.
Twitter was sued by the Union of French Jewish Students. Twitter claimed that they were abiding the laws of the country that they operate in and that only a US judge could make them adhere to the request of releasing their identities.
The Paris tribunal ruled that Twitter must hand over the information such as their names, email and IP addresses or face being fined $1,300 a day. Twitter is now said to be reviewing the court’s decision. They have already removed the tweets that the union said strongly breached France’s hate speech laws.
Twitter said that they do not monitor or are aware of all the content on their network but will look at the reports of tweets that may be against their policies or tweets that are illegal.
MANILA, Philippines (UPDATED) – The company of controversial Japanese billionaire Kazuo Okada filed Internet libel case versus his partner-turned-bitter foe, Steve Wynn, in Manila for “maliciously” leaking to the press a report adversarial to Okada.
In a December 13 disclosure to the Japanese stock exchange, Okada-led Universal Entertainment Corp. said the group filed a criminal complaint against Wynn, chairman of Wynn Resorts where Okada was vice chair and the biggest shareholder, at a local court in Parañaque City.